As I looked for a good article to encapsulate the "Sokol Affair" that I mentioned in class, it turns out the best short treatment I found on it was trusty old "Wikipedia."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sokal_affair
I was mistaken in class when I said that the original article had passed peer review. The journal, "Social Text," was NOT a peer-reviewed journal at the time. You can bet that it sure as heck is now. Furthermore, the issue at hand was a special issue on "The Science Wars" in which they were soliciting articles about the disjuncture between postmodern critiques of natural science and scientific critiques of postmodernism. Whatever its faults, Sokal's satirical piece seemed to fit right into that theme.
I don't want to make too much of this controversy- it was a bit embarrassing but in no way de-legitimizes (if that is a word) the decades of scholarship, mountains of publications, and honorable and successful careers of the many so-called "postmodernist" intellectual. Not any more than unmasking a shyster lawyer negates the careers of the many competent jurists, a false conviction overturns the myriad legal cases that the system got right, or a bad game exposes the true nature of a star athlete.
And along the lines of postmodernism being concerned with consumerism, public media and parody or satire, here is a link to the brand slogan feature I mentioned.
http://imgur.com/a/H6vfA
Finally, here's a small blurb aboyt The Simposn and postmodernism. There are better articles out there, but you've already had plenty to read and this one is short.
http://simpsonsculture.blogspot.com/2007/08/postmodernism.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sokal_affair
I was mistaken in class when I said that the original article had passed peer review. The journal, "Social Text," was NOT a peer-reviewed journal at the time. You can bet that it sure as heck is now. Furthermore, the issue at hand was a special issue on "The Science Wars" in which they were soliciting articles about the disjuncture between postmodern critiques of natural science and scientific critiques of postmodernism. Whatever its faults, Sokal's satirical piece seemed to fit right into that theme.
I don't want to make too much of this controversy- it was a bit embarrassing but in no way de-legitimizes (if that is a word) the decades of scholarship, mountains of publications, and honorable and successful careers of the many so-called "postmodernist" intellectual. Not any more than unmasking a shyster lawyer negates the careers of the many competent jurists, a false conviction overturns the myriad legal cases that the system got right, or a bad game exposes the true nature of a star athlete.
And along the lines of postmodernism being concerned with consumerism, public media and parody or satire, here is a link to the brand slogan feature I mentioned.
http://imgur.com/a/H6vfA
Finally, here's a small blurb aboyt The Simposn and postmodernism. There are better articles out there, but you've already had plenty to read and this one is short.
http://simpsonsculture.blogspot.com/2007/08/postmodernism.html